25.7% of people in rural areas, 13.7% in urban areas, now live below poverty line, according to the plan panel
Poverty in India declined to a record 22% in 2011-12, the Planning Commission disclosed on Tuesday. Over the last decade, poverty has witnessed a consistent decline with the levels dropping from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. The number of poor is now estimated at 269.3 million, of which 216.5 million reside in rural India
While the trend is not surprising, the extent of the decline has opened up a debate on the factors that have led to it. The numbers themselves may be debatable but they are reflective of a broader trend.
Poverty in India declined to a record 22% in 2011-12, the Planning Commission disclosed on Tuesday. Over the last decade, poverty has witnessed a consistent decline with the levels dropping from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. The number of poor is now estimated at 269.3 million, of which 216.5 million reside in rural India
While the trend is not surprising, the extent of the decline has opened up a debate on the factors that have led to it. The numbers themselves may be debatable but they are reflective of a broader trend.
One theory is that this is the outcome of the
trickle-down impact of the record growth witnessed in the first decade
of the new millennium.
This growth, though, has not been accompanied by a
commensurate rise in employment, implying that its benefits have not
really trickled down. Still, the growth did result in higher tax
revenue, enabling the government to fund a large social sector spending
programme.
This programme, which included schemes such as the rural
job guarantee one, played a significant part in reducing India’s poverty
levels, an alternative theory says.
The seven-year period between 2004-05 and 2011-12 saw the
development expenditure of the government trending upwards, with its
share increasing from 38% in 2004-05 to 45% of total expenditure in
2011-12.
The two theories, in some way, mirror the ongoing debate
between Nobel laureate Amartya Sen and Columbia University economist
Jagdish Bhagwati. While Sen makes a case for integrating development
expenditure with growth to combat poverty, Bhagwati argues that rapid
growth should be the priority, with the resulting trickle-down taking
care of the underprivileged.
According to the release from the Planning Commission,
25.7% of people in rural areas were below the so-called poverty line and
13.7% in urban areas. This is comparable with 33.8% and 20.9%,
respectively, in 2009-10, and 42% and 25.5%, respectively, in 2004-05.
The poverty numbers are estimated on the basis of
consumption expenditure captured in the five-year surveys undertaken by
the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). The decline in poverty numbers
was first reported by The Hindu on 16 July.
The press release sought to show that the number of poor
has declined faster in the period during which the Congress-led United
Progressive Alliance was in power and that, in the same period, the
monthly expenditure per person had increased more equitably, especially
in rural areas. Nearly 20 million people were pulled out of poverty
every year, the data showed.
While experts welcomed the decline in poverty, they flagged concerns such as the comparability of the numbers.
No comments:
Post a Comment